Questionable Styling: The Ugliest Adventure Bikes Ever?
This article delves into the often-debated aesthetics of adventure motorcycles, arguing that many models prioritize function over form to their detriment. The author compiles a list of what they consider some of the least visually appealing adventure bikes, highlighting issues like excessive plastics and awkward design choices. The piece kicks off by dissecting the Kawasaki KLE 500, citing its small windscreen and overall proportions as key aesthetic flaws.
The world of adventure motorcycling is frequently criticized for its questionable styling choices, with many bikes seemingly prioritizing function over aesthetic appeal. While some might argue that designers are solely focused on performance, examples like classic Land Rovers or Land Cruisers demonstrate that rugged capability and good looks can coexist.
The author posits that a significant portion of modern adventure bikes are clad in 'repulsive plastics' intended to conceal internal components. These plastics, however, often fail to achieve an aesthetically pleasing result, contributing to a general sense of visual mediocrity across the segment. The article aims to highlight particularly egregious examples from motorcycle history.
One such bike singled out is the Kawasaki KLE 500, produced from 1991 to 2007. This model, which combined an adventure touring chassis with an EX500 engine, was a reliable and affordable option, particularly in Europe. However, its design is critiqued for a notably tiny windscreen, which the author likens to a 'bodybuilder that skipped their neck exercises.' While this was a common design flaw in adventure bikes of that era and easily remedied with an aftermarket part, the initial choice is deemed 'daft.' Despite this, the front end of the bike from the tank rearwards is considered decent.